
Inheritance often stirs many emotions. Following the death of a close relative, not only do grief and a sense of loss arise, but also the issue of dividing the estate accumulated by the deceased during their lifetime. While the process of confirming the acquisition of the inheritance, whether based on the deceased's will or statutory law, proceeds relatively quickly, the division of the estate itself can generate conflicts among family members and often requires resolution by the court.
The purpose of the division of the estate is to allocate the assets left by the deceased to the individual heirs. Until the division of the estate is conducted, there exists a co-ownership of the entire estate among the heirs in fractional parts. Consequently, each heir is entitled to a specific share (e.g., ½, ¼) in each item belonging to the estate. This results in the heirs being unable to freely dispose of the items belonging to the estate.
Conducting the division of the estate enables the termination of the co-ownership of the estate, and consequently, the assignment of its individual components to specific individuals. As a result, each heir knows exactly what they have received as part of the inheritance from the deceased, thus organizing the deceased's financial affairs.
The division of the estate can take various forms. However, in practice, the following variants are encountered:
The division of the estate can be conducted by the heirs in the form of a concluded agreement, under which each receives specific components of the estate. The agreement may impose an obligation of compensation on some heirs. If the estate includes real property, a visit to a notary and the preparation of a notarial deed are necessary. Contractual division of the estate is faster, cheaper, and less stressful than judicial division.
In the vast majority of cases, unfortunately, the heirs are unable to reach a consensus, which complicates inheritance matters. In such cases, the only available solution remains the division of the estate in court. The court, after conducting proceedings regarding the division of the estate, decides how to distribute the assets left by the deceased among the heirs.
The proceedings regarding the division of the estate consist of several stages, which include:
The costs of proceedings regarding the division of the estate left by the deceased consist of the following elements:
In dividing the estate, the court particularly considers:
How does the court divide the estate? The key elements are the size of shares resulting from the will or statutory law, the possibilities of dividing the estate in kind, and the situation of the parties – for example, the fact that someone resides in the inherited property while another heir already has their own accommodation. The court strives to arrange the division so that each heir receives assets corresponding to their share. If this is not possible, a system of compensation or sale is applied.
Polish law does not mandate the division of the estate. However, managing the estate can be difficult, if not impossible, when every decision requires the consent of all heirs. For this reason, sooner or later, heirs decide to divide the estate (with the assistance of adwokat Gdańsk) to effectively manage the inheritance received.
In the case of a contractual division of the estate, the heirs can agree on who will bear the costs and to what extent. Typically, heirs share the costs proportionally to the size of their shares in the estate, although they can also agree on a different method of settlement.
In the context of judicial division of the estate, the court usually apportions the costs of the proceedings among all heirs in proportion to their shares. However, in justified cases, the court may charge one party with all or a larger portion of the court costs if it finds that the party unjustifiably prolonged or complicated the proceedings.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
I highly recommend the Haber&Haber Law Firm and collaboration with Counsel Błażej Haber. Professionalism, diligence, and high personal culture assured me that I was in the right place. I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude for the empathy and humane approach to the client. In a word, a wonderful person.

I highly recommend 100%! This is undoubtedly one of the best attorneys. He addressed my issue immediately despite the limited time before the proceedings. The time of day for consultations was irrelevant. The case was concluded in the manner we had agreed upon. I advise others not to hesitate to call and discuss their situation.

